Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, in Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, stating that “In Korea, is the president of E restaurant, is not the president, and that F is not the president,” and that the Defendant was not drinking with the mind of ice cream. It means the fraud, which is the change of flabing lab lab lab lab lab, lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab,” at the same place as the police officer on September 201, 201, and G, at the same place as the police officer on September 201, 201, that “F means the Doar lab lab lids installed in the vicinity of E restaurant, and disposed of to 200,000 won,”
2. This is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act that cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. The victim F may be acknowledged on March 6, 2013, which was after the institution of the instant indictment, as a witness and the statement of intent to punish the defendant is withdrawn. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.