logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원영월지원 2020.08.11 2019고단385
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the defendant of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a Bchip low-income vehicle;

On June 2, 2019, around 11:30 on June 2, 2019, the Defendant came to turn to the left a three-lane road, which is a one-lane road in front of the C hotel in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, from the “Gangland Tri-distance,” to the “D” page.

Since there is a three-distance intersection, a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front side and the left side side of the motor vehicle and to accurately operate the steering and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeds from the Defendant’s negligence, which led directly from “E” side of “E” side by the victim F (E, South and 62 years old) to the “G SP car driving ahead of the driver’s seat of the G SP car.” The Defendant received the part of the G SP car driving ahead of the steering seat of the car.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the Defendant, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim H (V, South and 62 years of age), who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, such as chills, tensions, and so on, for about two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the above spke car, which is an occupation-user of the victim, to the extent of KRW 644,246 of the repairing cost.

2. He shall not operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Korea Communications Commission to report the occurrence of a traffic accident, photographs of the vehicle involved in the accident, actual condition survey report, internal investigation report (victim H telephone communications), each diagnosis letter, estimate, and information that is not mandatory insurance;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow