A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 21, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assaults against Drivers) committed on or around 00:55 on November 21, 2017, even though the injured party in the D Co., Ltd., in the operation of the D Co., Ltd., Ltd. (43 tax) is going to the E district at the request of the Defendant, even though he/she is in the middle of the E district.

“In doing so, the part of the victim’s head and ear on the back seat of the said taxi was cut up to 10 times, and the victim’s head and ear on 10 occasions, and the victim’s back water three times due to drinking, and the victim was damaged by thring up to 2 weeks of treatment, and string down, etc., which require two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of the vehicle and caused the injury.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On November 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) heard the statement from the said victim on the circumstances of the instant case at the Busan Northern Police Station E District located in the Busan Northern Police Station located in the Busan Northern District, on November 21, 2017; and (b) confirmed the Defendant’s personal information; and (c) confirmed the said G’s personal information.

“The above G is asked to the Defendant “E District”

“ Handing to the answer,” the said G was cut one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the protection of the lives and bodies of the people.

B. On November 21, 2017, around 03:17, the Defendant: (a) at the H and office of the North Korean Police Station H and the office located in the Busan Northern-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, a slope of the said H and the affiliated H are walking the Defendant’s left side of the said I due to the defect that the Defendant would sit as the suspect in order to investigate the foregoing case; and (b) the Defendant took one-time face of the said I.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, G, and I;

1. A photograph of part of the victim C damage;

1. The stude video of a taxi that is being driven;

1. CCTV inside the earth.