The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant merely finds a victim at each time and time in the judgment of the court below, and the court below did not have committed a crime as stated in the judgment of the court below, which erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Even if the Defendant’s conviction is recognized, the lower court’s punishment (basic fine of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable in light of various sentencing conditions in the instant case.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake, D consistently submitted a written complaint to the police, and consistent from the date of the investigation to the court below, “the defendant will die and die,” and he collected reflectors, etc. inside the cooling house, and scambling the victim’s head, etc. on October 20, 2013. On October 20, 2013, the victim’s oral statement was 10: (a) the victim’s oral statement was 10: (b) the victim’s oral statement was made on November 11, 2013; (c) the victim’s oral statement was 4; (d) the victim’s oral statement was 10:10; (d) the victim’s oral statement was 10; (d) the victim’s oral statement was 1; and (d) the victim’s family record was 14; and (d) the victim’s family protection case was 13; and (d) the victim’s family record was 14.