Text
1. Defendant A Co., Ltd. shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 14,180,00,000 as well as the year from October 5, 2015 to March 24, 2017.
Reasons
. A contract for the transfer and acquisition of business rights purchased in separate sheet (hereinafter “instant contract for the transfer of business”).
(1) The object transferred to A (Plaintiff) by the Defendant A (Defendant A Co., Ltd.) shall be 14% equivalent to 28% of the interests of Suwon Convention Center(construction right, sale right) and the business rights of Suwon Convention Center(sale right) owned by the Plaintiff (Plaintiff).
2) On October 31, 2008, the term “C Private Investment Project Convention” (hereinafter referred to as “Public Investment Convention”) signed between Suwon and Suwon Convention (U.S.), Hyundai Construction (State), and (State) A, as the subject of the above transfer, is based on the “C Private Investment Project Agreement” (hereinafter referred to as “Public Investment Agreement”). Article 2(1) A pays B the amount of gold-day three hundred billion won (13,00,000,000) with the amount of the business license acquisition.
(Additional Tax).* 14% transfer value of 14% equity interest in Suwon Convention (States): 00 million won (1,200,000,000) * Transfer value of the business right (construction right and sale right): gold million won (11,80,000,000) additional tax * The transfer value subject to the comprehensive right of the business right that is accepted separately from the above classification * The transfer value subject to the comprehensive right of the business right that is accepted separately.
2) A would take over 14% of the shares in B by paying the above transfer proceeds to B. In the event that the “Private Investment Convention” in Article 4(3)(2) has been destroyed or invalidated for any reason, this agreement shall also be null and void. (2) Of the transfer contracts of this case, the parts relating to this case relating thereto are as follows.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, 3 through 10 (including branch numbers in case of additional number), the inquiry result of this court's inquire of the original market, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A
A. As to the invalidity of the new agreement of this case, the new agreement of this case is deemed to be invalid.