The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant did not have the victim's chest by his hand, or did not have the victim's chest by his hand, and did not have the victim's cellular phone cited by his hand to fall off on the floor.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the victim E and F, the Defendant was at an investigative agency; (ii) the Defendant took a bath while pushing the victim getting out of the bus; and (iii) the Defendant was at the bus upon the victim’s happiness; and (iv) the Defendant was at the time of a dispute with the victim and reported the victim to the police; and (v) the Defendant was found to have fallen off the cell phone by getting off the cell phone owned by the victim’s hand and falling down on the floor.

(2) In the case of a black image installed inside a bus, the witness was found to fall off on the floor by keeping the victim's scam from the bus and scambling the victim's scam from the bus; the mobile phone of the victim's scambling seems to fall on the floor; ③ At an investigative agency where the victim's scam was involved in an accident in the nearby scam, the witness was found to fall off on the floor by scaming the victim's scam and the cellular phone scam used by the victim's hand.

In light of the statement, the fact that the defendant assaultss the victim as stated in the decision of the court below and damages the mobile phone owned by the victim can be fully recognized.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

B. The Defendant appears to have committed a crime by misunderstanding that the victim E made a bad speech to himself/herself, and the degree of assault against the victim is relatively minor.

However, the defendant.