logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고단46
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 20:45 on June 29, 2014, the Defendant threatened the victim E with 30cc in length (15cc in length, 15cc in length, knife) of 30cm in length, which is a dangerous and dangerous object for the victim E (16 years of age) to the victim E on the ground that the victim E (the victim E) was flick at the seat of her own examination. On the same day, the Defendant threatened the victim E with the victim E by threatening the victim E’s knife at a size of 30cc in length (15cm in length, 15cm in length, knife in length) and threatening the victim E’s knife at the front of the D Library at around 21:0 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The rejection of witness E, F, and G’s respective legal statements [the rejection by causing a suspicion that there is no reasonable ground to believe that the evidence is sufficient to prove is beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence” (see Supreme Court Decision 2013Do14656, May 16, 2014). In a case where the statements made by witnesses, such as the victim, etc., are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, the rejection shall not be made without permission, unless there is any separate evidence to deem that the credibility is obvious from an objective perspective (see Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). In this case, each of the statements made by the victim E and F, who correspond to the facts charged, are consistent from the time of the investigation to this court, and they are credibility in each of the statements made by witnesses in light of their respective attitudes and the contents of their respective statements made in the court, and supported them].

1. The defendant who recorded the defendant's statement in the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant against the defendant was denied the crime at the police investigation stage, and committed the crime at the time of investigation by the prosecutor.

arrow