logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.30 2014나45005
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, 300,000 won for the Defendant respectively to the Plaintiff AT (19), AV (21), BK (41), BS (52), and B (57).

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the statement, except that the defendant Gap and Eul are used as "A, etc." and "A, etc." as "A, etc." among the corresponding parts of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. As a result of the occurrence of defects, the Defendant shall compensate the Plaintiffs who own the instant building for damages equivalent to the expenses incurred in repairing the said defects, since the instant collapse incident occurred in the course of the construction of the ground-breaking construction of the new construction of the instant case, which occurred in the course of the construction of the ground-breaking construction of the instant building, due to cracks, damage, etc. inside and outside the instant building. The Defendant shall compensate for the damages equivalent to the expenses incurred in repairing the said defects to each Plaintiff.

2. The damages corresponding to the section in the damages list shall be described in each column and the section for common use; and

B. The Defendant’s new construction of this case: (a) due to the noise, dust, vibration, vibration, shock, etc., which occurred in the course of the ground-breaking construction work; and (b) the noise, dust, vibration, shock, etc., which occurred in the course of the ground-breaking construction, the Plaintiffs, who were residing in the building of this case during the new construction period, suffered mental damage; and (c) even though the Plaintiff X, X, Y, Z, andO did not reside in the building of this case, the lessee of the divided building owned by them was refused to pay rent or terminated the lease contract on the ground that the lessee of the household owned by them was suffered mental damage due to the above noise, etc.; and (d)

2. The same shall be written in the column for claiming consolation money on the details of compensation;

3. Determination

A. The court's explanation on this part of the liability for damages is "the defendant in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance."

arrow