beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the following real estate:
① (2) The above ① Housing 1st floor attached to 1st floor of a building on the ground Babro roof in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”) (3) The above
B. The Defendant is the owner of the Daegu Nam-gu Flue-gu 870 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant-owned land”).
C. The plaintiff and the defendant own each of them.
(b) The location of the real estate as described in paragraph (d) shall be as listed in the Appendix No. 2.
Plaintiff
(3) Ownership land is adjacent to west-gu Daegu-gu G road of 117 square meters (owners: Daegu-gu).
The land owned by the Defendant is adjoining to west-gu H 123 square meters (owners: state, road management agency: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport).
[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 1-2, and Eul evidence 2, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim for confirmation, etc. of traffic right over surrounding land
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff owns a house on the ground owned by the Plaintiff, and ① the land owned by the Plaintiff is surrounded by land owned by another person, including the land owned by the Defendant.
원고는 피고 소유 토지 중 별지 도면 1 표시 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈎부분 60㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 ㈎부분’이라 한다)를 원고 소유 ①토지로부터 공로로 출입하기 위한 통행로로 사용해오고 있었다.
그런데 피고가 이 사건 ㈎부분에 막대를 박고 철망을 설치하는 등으로 원고의 통행을 방해하고 있다.
원고는 피고를 상대로 이 사건 ㈎부분에 대한 주위토지통행권의 확인, 막대와 철망의 철거, 통행방해행위의 금지를 구한다.
(b)the right of passage for one surrounding land is whatever;