logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.04.12 2016나52634
면책
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the fourth eight to fourteen of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff received the loan as the principal debtor of the loan of this case, and completed the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage on the real estate of this case owned by the Plaintiff, ② reported bankruptcy and immunity from the time of the Plaintiff’s receipt of the loan of this case to the non-party Seocho Agricultural Cooperatives, ② the Plaintiff reported bankruptcy and immunity from the time of the loan of this case to the non-party 4 years, ③ the Plaintiff had not yet arrived at the maturity date of the loan of this case at the time of the report of bankruptcy and exemption, ③ the Plaintiff’s overall assertion was known, but it was thought that the purchaser of the real estate of this case would have repaid the loan of this case, and thus, the purpose of the loan of this case is not to know the existence of the loan of this case, but to take into account the fact that the Plaintiff did not enter it in the list of creditors. Thus, in light of the above legal principles, the claim of this case constitutes a claim for non-exclusive

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow