A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defrauded did not think that the goods were used even if the goods, such as air cleaners, but did not have any particular property or monthly importation, and thus, did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost of using the siren, even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost of using the siren, the Defendant used the handphone, which was opened in B’s name, as if the Defendant was B, carried out the goods as if the Defendant was a B, carried out the goods, throw away the goods, and then borrowed the goods as security in the pawn, or sold the goods at the sales store.

On March 10, 2015, the Defendant sent a telephone to the call center of Dongyang Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Dongyang”) at the time of not more than Gwangju around March 10, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “Dongyang”) and sent his resident registration number, etc. to the employees in charge as if he were B.

“Falsely speaking to the purport that it was “A” was issued on March 11, 2015 from the victim’s dong-dong position, one of which was the former lele equivalent to the market value of KRW 1,166,100 at the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju Seo-gu, and one of the air cleaners equivalent to KRW 1,338,00 at the market value.

The defendant, including this, from that time to that year.

4. By the same method, 30.30. A total of 18,476,100 won in the market price was delivered by the same method, such as electronic stamps, air cleaners, etc.

2. On March 11, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) received from the employee in charge of the installation of the distribution of the said walk, as described in paragraph (1), one electronic lele, and one air conditioning machine, which the Defendant ordered by telephone, such as paragraph (1); (b) entered two copies of the rental tact contract paper prepared in B in the name of the employee, into the personal name of each “B” in the 5th personal name, and signed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant is a siren contract in the name of the private document B on the rights and obligations.