1. The defendant shall pay KRW 120,000 to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

1. On August 29, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) leased 301, Dongdong-si Building D (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to KRW 120 million; and (b) purchased the instant building and acquired the obligation to return the deposit amount.

However, since the above lease contract is implicitly renewed, but it terminated by the plaintiff's declaration of termination on May 2015, the plaintiff sought the return of the above lease deposit to the defendant.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;

3. Some dismissed parts of the Plaintiff also sought damages for delay against the lease deposit, but there is no evidence to prove that the lessor’s duty to return the lease deposit and the lessee’s duty to deliver the leased object are concurrently performed, and that the Plaintiff, the lessee, performed the duty to deliver or deliver the real estate in this case, and thus, the claim for this part of this case is dismissed as