1. Defendant A’s fine of KRW 80,000, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 800,000, Defendant C’s fine of KRW 800,000, and Defendant C’s.

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 201, the victims of the victims of the Silsan Construction Co., Ltd. was performing construction works to build forest roads through the procedures for reporting on temporary use of mountainous districts from the number of Geumsan-gun to the Republic of Korea, Geumsan-gun I, etc., and was trying to resume construction works again from January 4, 2016.

The Defendants were residents of the Chungcheongnam-gun-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and Defendant A was the chairman of the promotion committee to prevent the above construction work of the victimized party, and the rest of the Defendants were the members of the promotion committee. From August 2011, the Defendants conspired to stop the above construction work of the victimized party.

After the Defendants recruited as above, around January 23, 2016, Defendants B, A, E, and F interfere with the passage of the construction equipment by blocking access roads to heavy equipment in the above J village from the hacks, and Defendant D obstructed the progress of plkes in the river near the above J Village promptly, around January 23, 2016. Defendant E was from January 23, 2016 to January 23, 2016.

2. From January 4, 2016 to June 7, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B interfered with the passage of construction equipment by putting a horse on the access road construction site of the said J village. On May 30, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B interfered with the work regarding the progress of the construction by blocking the passage of scramen from the access road at the construction site of the forest road construction site of the said J village. The Defendants, as they move with the residents of the said J village from January 4, 2016 to June 7, 2016, failed to gather the equipment around the equipment, such as scramen, which the injured party operates to perform the construction work, preventing the passage of the roads that the scraf in which the sckes enter, and interfered with the operation of the construction work by force, such as leaving the access road at the construction site of the horse, freight cars, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. In the case of Defendant A, a protocol of suspect interrogation (two times) concerning Defendant A (Minutes)