A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a DNA SM520 vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 10km from the road near the Ulsan-gun accounting of Ulsan-gun around 05:20 on November 2, 2015 to the front distance of about 05:40 on the same day.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a car.

On November 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.088% among blood transfusions at around 05:40 on November 2, 2015, and moved to a right-hand way from the south side of the company C in front of the racing-si to the outer shore of about 30km in speed.

At the same time, it was a three-distance intersection in which the center line of yellow solid lines is installed at night, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to reduce the speed, to take the right and the right on the road, and to safely drive the vehicle and prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so, did not look at the front line, and obstructed by the bypassing the center line, received the front portion of the F Poter Cargo Driving from the outer shore to the left from the right side of the Defendant’s car, which the victim E (54) driven by the victim E (54) who got left to the left from the outer shore.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of a car DST520.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said car without being subscribed to mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 2.