The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s determination of the grounds for appeal reflects the Defendant’s fault in depth; and (b) the Defendant has provided an important investigation cooperation with respect to the crime of narcotics.

However, the Defendant had been punished several times for the crime of narcotics, and even if he was investigated by Defendant’s report by Defendant’s wife on the administration of philophones on February 6, 2013, the Defendant committed the same kind of crime at all times, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and the lower court sentenced the lower limit of the sentencing guidelines in light of the circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment was issued, and there is no change in special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as specified in the argument and the record of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime was committed, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable. Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.