logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2012.09.06 2012고정33
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a CM3 car.

1. A violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 14:20 on August 14, 201, while proceeding the intersection in front of an express bus terminal in the Choyang-dong at the early early night from the west-dong west-dong to the inner air protection, and stopped for the signal atmosphere.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely by accurately operating the transmission device and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led to a change of speed system due to the negligent negligence that led to a sudden change of speed system, and caused the front ender of the E-Baa-car of the D Driving, which was in the signal atmosphere, to the following ender of the Defendant’s driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (the 63-year-old) who was the passenger of the said So-Baa car, such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the influence of the 3-day medical treatment, and injury to the victim G (the 56-year-old and female) in light of the detailed unknown situation requiring approximately 3-day medical treatment, and the tensions and tensions in the pela car.

2. On August 14, 201, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) around 14:20 on August 14, 201, caused a traffic accident, such as the preceding paragraph, at the front intersection of a rapid bus terminal that is in the early early early operation of the city, and (b) damaged the amount of KRW 650,000 of the repair cost for the Eba vehicle driven by the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused (including D substitute part);

1. Application of each photograph, written statement of DNA preparation, each diagnosis and medical records (F, G), and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and fines

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a provisional payment order shall be issued.

arrow