A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On August 17, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Western District Court for the crime of forging official documents. On December 27, 2009, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on April 24, 2009 and completed the execution of the above sentence. On December 24, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years and two months of imprisonment with prison labor and a fine of one hundred million won on March 10, 201.

Around January 2010, the Defendant, as a bail director Co., Ltd., the Defendant, at the office D office of the first floor in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul E-building, stated that “In Korea, I have been doing bail business for 25 years, I have been doing business against China and Hong Kong, and the purchase of tin and sale of tin remaining balance, or the processing and sale of tin can bring a lot of profits. When investing in this business, I would pay a profit-sharing amount equivalent to 10% of the investment principal at the latest.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not purchase raw stone abroad as the state of bad credit standing at the time, and received investment money from the victims and paid some of them as the source of investment income, and paid part of the remainder as the personal purpose was to use it.

In addition, from around April 2010, the Defendant conspired with H et al. in collusion with H et al., and was prepared to commit the crime for the purpose of carrying out and exercising the check paper 10,000 won per 1 billion won per face value in China. As such, the Defendant actually displayed the forged cashier’s checks (an amount equivalent to approximately KRW 500 million per face value) that have been closely imported to the victims around June 30, 2010, and there was no intention or ability to pay the agreed profits even if the Defendant received the investment money from the victims, such as influencing its own ability to receive the additional investment money from the victims.

As such, by deceiving the victims and deceiving them, the victim F. 40 million won on February 11, 2010, and the same year

3.1.1.