A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On October 20, 2017, at around 01:07, the Defendant: (a) 01:07 reported at B of Busan, and sent back, and (b) 112, sent to the police officer in charge of the Defendant’s duties, the Defendant expressed the Defendant’s desire to attempt to cause harm to the Defendant’s wife; (c) d’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following favorable circumstances required for the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than five years;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] the scope of the punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] that interferes with the performance of official duties, and the factors to be mitigated [the person who interferes with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties]: Where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or interference with the performance of official duties is insignificant (the scope of the recommended punishment, the scope of the recommended punishment), the mitigated area, one month to eight months.

3. That the degree of robbery of assault exercised by the defendant in the decision of sentence and obstruction of official business is serious;

It is difficult to see the fact that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime contingently in the event of decomposition and decomposition with the wife, etc., considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and comprehensively considering all the factors indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, and determine the punishment as ordered.