The defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Gwangju District Court for embezzlement, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 8, 2013.

From February 2, 2010, the Defendant, while serving as the head of a branch or branch office of B insurance company, received benefits from the head office based on the insurance performance, while operating expenses, such as office rents and insurance premium activity expenses, directly borne by the principal. The Defendant paid approximately KRW 100,000 of office operating funds and living expenses, which are insufficient due to business depression, and the liabilities used for the loan to the branch have been incurred by the branch, and approximately KRW 44,000,000 of office operating expenses and the amount arbitrarily embezzled for the purpose of raising insufficient funds, but there is a need for the Defendant to pay the same in full even if having borrowed money from others, there is no intention or ability to pay it properly.

In addition, (State) as the head of C branch office, did not think of the full-time payment of the money with employees, and only used the money for the purpose of paying the money, and there was a plan to transfer the good conditions of service with another insurance company to the employees of another insurance company.

Nevertheless, on October 2012, the Defendant loaned KRW 20,000,000 to the victim E (n, 40 years of age) who is the representative of the 1st century of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D D Building (ju), at the office of the branch office of the branch office of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant settled the agency of the existing insurance company, and made a false statement that 20 insurance solicitors who work together with 20 insurance solicitors who work as the head of the branch office of the (ju)C will increase their sales and make a false statement that he/she would repay the proceeds without any framework.

Around October 10, 2012, the Defendant received from the victim a remittance of KRW 10,000,000,000 from one bank account in the name of the Defendant’s wife, and KRW 10,000,000, in total, from the same account around November 29, 2012.