1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following matters to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

① On the 6th page 20, “In difficult” was added to “(the Plaintiff also argued that the medical record appraisal in the instant lawsuit was erroneous in calculating the loss rate of labor ability, but there is no ground to acknowledge it, as well as the result of the Plaintiff’s appraisal of the Katol University’s Malo Hospital in the previous lawsuit that the Plaintiff would have adopted in the instant case, also calculated the loss rate of labor ability according to the classification table according to the degree of Mabro’s pain.”

(2) On face 7, the following shall be added to the first place:

“㈓ 원고는 또한 이 사건 상이인 ‘좌측 좌골신경통’ 외에 요추부 추간판탈출증 발병가능성이 있으므로 이 사건 상이와 요추부 추간판탈출증에 대한 복합장애율을 고려하여야 한다고 주장하나, 원고에 대한 요추부 추간판탈출증은 국가유공자법에 의한 인정 상이라고 판정되었다는 자료가 없는 이상, 이를 전제로 하는 위 주장은 받아들일 수 없다.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.