The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (10 months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the mistake, the damage caused by the crime of this case was recovered considerably, the defendant paid 80,000 won to the victim K, and the defendant did not have the same criminal record.

However, the crime of this case was repeated at least 40 times under the same law for a period close to one year, and its nature is not good.

The sum of the value of damaged goods that can know the market price reaches 7 million won.

There is no special change in circumstances that would be different from the original judgment in the first instance.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.