1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant is a company established on December 1, 200 and engaged in the production, sale, etc. of environmental pollution preventive facilities. 2) The Plaintiff is a director of the Defendant’s in-house C and senior church as a vice president from around 2005 and retired around November 30, 2012.

B. The Defendant, as indicated in the table below, filed an application for patent registration with the Plaintiff as the inventor, the Defendant as the patentee, and filed three inventions with the Defendant as the patentee.

(hereinafter) The invention is indicated in the same manner as “an invention,” and all of them are collectively referred to as “the invention of this case” according to the sequences described therein. [Contents of the invention] On the date of registration of the patent application, the name of the inventor, 1D EF G Plaintiff 1D G, Defendant 2HJ G G, Defendant 2HIJ, Defendant 3 L MNO Plaintiff 3, Defendant 29 through 34, and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion that he is an employee of the defendant, completed the invention of this case independently, and succeeded to the defendant's right to obtain a patent for the invention of this case so that the defendant can obtain a patent registration under his name. The defendant provided the invention of this case and received a number of construction works as shown in the attached Form No. 1.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 50,00,000 as part of the lawful compensation for employee’s inventions under Article 15(1) of the former Invention Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 11960, Jul. 30, 2013; hereinafter “former Invention Promotion Act”).

(A) a request for an express part; (b)

The fact that the Defendant, whether the Plaintiff is a sole inventor of the instant invention, was registered as a patent for the instant invention by making the inventor of the instant invention the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff is as seen earlier.