beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,662,932 as well as 5% per annum from October 1, 2013 to June 11, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff filed a payment order against C and D, the Defendant’s parents, with the Government Branch of the Seoul District Court (hereinafter “Seoul District Court”) No. 2003 tea11850, and C and D jointly received a payment order from the said court with the Plaintiff jointly and severally, with the amount of KRW 176,629,324 and the amount calculated at the rate of 24% per annum from June 1, 2003 to the date of complete payment. The said payment order was finalized on October 10, 2003.
B. On July 5, 2012, upon the above payment order, the Plaintiff enforced a compulsory execution against the movable property in Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Ein-gu, 106, where C or D resides.
(U) Creditor: 1/10 of the claim amount (price 2003j11850 of the Government Branch of the Seoul District Court) of Mayang Branch 2012No. 3233. The above agreed amount will be settled by mutual agreement with the Mayang Branch 2012No. 3223 of the Mayang Branch 2012 Mayang Branch 1/10 of the Mayang Branch 2012.
However, the fire insurance (C) purchased a stable fire insurance policy of 40 million won on October 30, 2006, and the insurance amount of 12.3 million won was expected to be paid on or around February 2007, and the Plaintiff seized the above insurance amount on March 21, 2007). If the insurance amount exceeds 1/10, the insurance amount will be replaced with the insurance amount, and if 1/10 is the mother and child, the debtor and the guarantor will be liable and repaid.
(Period of Performance, September 30, 2013). (C)
On July 25, 2013, the Defendant agreed with the Plaintiff to repay part of the above debt owed to C and D to the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff, and signed the following agreements (hereinafter “instant agreement”) on the column of joint and several guarantors:
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and Gap evidence Nos. 3 [Defendant] are written. The above agreement becomes null and void when the commitment performance is not known, and the guarantor and the debtor are the debtor.