The judgment below

Part 1-b, c, d, and 2 of the judgment shall be reversed.

The defendant is the first-party of the judgment of the court below.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the crime of No. 1 in the original judgment: Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and the crime of No. 1-b, c, d and 2 in the original judgment: Imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months) declared by the lower court is too unreasonable;

(1) Although Defendant and his defense counsel stated that the date and time of the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below is not around January 2013, 2013, but around February 20, 2013 as stated in the judgment of the court below, it does not constitute legitimate grounds for appeal and ex officio examination of facts as to the date and time of the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below does not seem to have any error of mistake as alleged by the Defendant and his defense counsel, as stated in the judgment of the court below, as to the date and time of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of Defendant and his defense counsel before the court of first instance until February 2013, C stated that the date and time of the crime of the crime of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of 21 of punishment of punishment of the court below.