The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (a prison term of eight months, a suspended sentence of two years, and an order to attend a compliance driving 40 hours) is too unfford and unreasonable.

2. The same year shall apply to the accused on April 6, 2016, even though he/she had a two-time driving experience and a one-time driving experience.

4.7. and

4. 8. Each of the instant non-licensed driving crimes was committed on April 8, 2016, and the fact that a child committed both drinking and drinking together on April 8, 2016 is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant’s mistake is against his own mistake, compensates for the amount of damage to the substitute victim that occurred in the course of drinking driving, and gives agreement with the victim, and scraps off and does not repeat again the Lone Star motor vehicle owned by the mother offered for driving without the instant license and drinking.

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) there is no history of criminal punishment exceeding a fine; and (b) there is no history of criminal punishment; and (c) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unfasible and

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.