Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the defendants are above two years.

Punishment of the crime

In around 2011, the Defendants, who entered the Republic of Korea and work as a seafarer, had the intent to steal and sell the sick language in C, which Defendant B works as a seafarer, to raise entertainment expenses.

At around 14:20 on June 2, 2013, the Defendants came to be in front of the victim D's necked coastal fishing vessel C at the same time at the same time at the same time as the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si. Defendant A reported the network, Defendant B was on board the above ship C, and the victim's market price on which the ship is in custody at the aft-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. On-site reports (with respect to the confirmation ofCCTV);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs ( common to the accused);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2, 201)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);