logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.02.16 2015고단1447
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 8, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in red support of the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon, Daejeon, issued a fine of KRW 1.5 million on April 4, 2014, and was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol) at the Suwon District Court of Daejeon.

On June 30, 2015, the Defendant driven B E-mail cars from the 2.7km section at around 2.7km to the mother’s station located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, according to the sanctal nature of 0.217%, while under the influence of alcohol during blood at around 01:05, the Defendant driven B-M cars from around 365 meters to the mother’s station located in 1156 as Sungnam-si.

2. The Defendant used the same date and time as the preceding paragraph, and while driving a taxi in front of the above mother’s length, and used the victim’s body at approximately 10 times as the victim’s face was flicked by the open window of the above taxi stopped pursuant to subparagraph (b), and used the victim’s body at approximately 2 times in order to resist the victim’s face and resist the victim’s body.

3. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, and upon receiving a report by assaulting the said C at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, was asked by the slope E belonging to the Dogwon Police Station, which was called out, about the circumstances of assaulting the said C, etc. from the said Dgrae E during the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station

“Absing to the floor of the said E with the hands, and obstructing the legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers’ criminal investigations, etc. by assaulting the E at least three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. Statement by the police for C and E;

3. A report on detection of and damage to the primary driver;

4. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (a summary order).

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for the crime; Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act for the crime; Articles 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 260(1) of the same Act for the punishment of imprisonment;

2. Aggravation of concurrent crimes;

arrow