beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the head of the G Association H team from December 2, 2009 to December 2, 2012, and thereafter works as the head of the I office, Defendant B is the head of the G Association J team from June 2007 to December 2012, and thereafter works as the head of the H team from June 2007 to December 2012.
K serves as the senior officer of the L Ocean head of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries, and the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries from September 19, 2010 to September 18, 2013, who served as the president of the G Union, andO as the head of the G Union from December 2009 to September 2012.
It is a person who has been promoted to the head of the P Headquarters.
1. The Defendants in breach of trust collected money and valuables in return for the provision of convenience, such as the provision of various contracts, such as the purchase of souvenirs of the G Cooperatives, a person in charge of the purchase business, and a person in charge of transaction affairs, such as a commemorative goods delivery company, printing company, etc., selected as a trading company in preference to a competitor in the future at the time of selecting a trading company in the future.
Defendant A’s sole criminal act of Q printing company (1) demanded that R, operating at the Seoul Buddhist District of Seoul around March 2012, 201, “the purpose of requesting Q printing company to cooperate” is to select a competitor as a trading company prior to the continuous competition company in the future and to pay a profit by raising the size of the transaction or the unit price. Defendant A obtained the R’s consent, as a consideration, around 3 million won, around 200,000 won, around August 2012, and around 3 million won, around September 2012, and around 200,000 won, from the same method.
As a result, Defendant A acquired property in return for an illegal solicitation in relation to his duties as a person in charge of another’s business.
(2) On February 2013, the Defendants’ joint criminal conduct continues to exist in the future when they demanded R to provide “a request for cooperation” to the R at the Seoul Buddhist District.