Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Fact-finding] On July 9, 1975, the water source protection area of the Yongsan Dam located on the Choyang-si, Namyang-si, Gyeonggi-do is located as a selling water source to supply clean water to approximately 25 million citizens in the Seoul Metropolitan area at the place designated as a water source protection area under the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act.

In order to protect the water quality of the water source protection zone, the development is extremely limited, and new restaurants cannot enter. With the development of traffic between recent 20 years, the number of floating population in order to view natural landscape, such as diversified sites, water pumping ecological parks, and Round mountain, has increased rapidly, and the number of unregistered restaurants began to increase rapidly by residents and out-of-the-spots.

The owners of the above restaurants have used the circumstances in which new restaurants could not enter, raising a lot of profits by operating them exclusively, reducing the size of business to avoid heavy punishment, and continuously operated illegal restaurants in the name of another person, such as family members and branch members, while being punished for minor punishment under the name of another person.

D is the owner of the E-ground building at the time of sports in South Korea, and Defendant A is the person who operates the above building with the trade name "F" in the above building.

1. No one shall change the use of a building in a water-source protection zone without obtaining permission from the competent authority;

Around January 1, 2014, the Defendant and D conspired with the Defendant to operate a restaurant in Nam-si, Gyeonggi-do, which is a water source protection zone, around January 1, 2014, and D leased the above land-based land-based mentir block block, 76.4m2, and 6.4m2, on the land, and the Defendant used approximately 50m2 out of the said mentirs and money as a resting restaurant from the same date to November 17, 2016.

2. The defendant A (Violation of the Food Sanitation Act) shall have jurisdiction in order to run a resting restaurant business.