beta
Text
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the person who requested the attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Determination on the part of the case of the defendant
A. The defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter "the defendant") asserted that the defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter "the defendant") did not contact the victim first with regard to the minor freedom under Paragraph (1) of the crime of the court below, the minor's coercion, and the violation of the Child Welfare Act (the coercion, mediation, sexual harassment, etc. against the child), but did not induce the victim. The victim's ambbbbbbbbbbbbs did not appear, and the victim's am and her ambbbbbbbbbbbbs were not involved, but there was no intention to commit an indecent act due to the negligence between the victim and his son.
The argument is asserted.
2) Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant is recognized to have induced a minor person under the age of 13 to commit an indecent act with the victim’s her her mbbbbbbbbbbbbs, and had the victim dance in line with the victim.
The lower judgment did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as alleged in the Defendant, and thus, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.
① From May 2016, the Defendant met the victim with the victim who was only 11 years old at the time and was given a telephone conversation or a text message with the victim who was her guardian during night hours, and the victim went out of his house through his own window to meet the Defendant, and the Defendant was also aware of such circumstances (the page 229,230 of the investigation record). Thus, even if the Defendant visited the victim first, the Defendant had the victim go out of the house of his guardian at night at night and later had the victim go out of the house of his guardian at night as described in the facts charged, it was an act under his control after the Defendant went out of the current protection condition to have the minor go out of the current protection condition.