logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.08.16 2017고정236
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 High 236] On January 27, 2017, the Defendant driven a BM6-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.075% in a section of about 200 meters from the 200-1st to the 45-1 mobilization road of Pyeongtaek-si at the same time.

[2017 High 237] Criminal history is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment on December 24, 2008 with labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Suwon District Court's Pyeongtaek District Court's House on December 24, 2008. On February 27, 2017, the Defendant is a person who was indicted for the same crime and has twice the past record of the same violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

Criminal facts

On February 5, 2017, at around 02:05, the Defendant driven a Cingcon vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.105% from around 500 meters away from the road in which Pyeongtaek-si will singing in Pyeongtaek-si to the same city-ro 110-gil 30,000, to the road in front of Taesansan-si.

[2017 고 정 317] 피고인은 2017. 2. 24. 19:00 경 평택시 D 피해자 E 이 직원으로 근무하는 F 매장 내에서, 술에 취해 이미 그만둔 피고인의 부인을 찾으며 아무런 이유 없이 피해자에게 “ 얌 마 너 이리 와 봐, 이 새끼야 ”라고 큰소리로 욕설을 하며 소란을 피워 약 10분 동안 피해자의 매장 영업업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 236]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of driving at home;

1. A statement of alcohol alcohol during the blood (2017 high-level 237);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of driving at home;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A previous conviction: A written inquiry and a report on the result of confirmation of a previous conviction before and after the disposition;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. On the investigation report (as to the content ofCCTV image data)

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 148-2(2)3 and 44(1) (i.e., self-driving on January 27, 2017) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 148-2(1)1 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow