Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) while under the influence of alcohol from Gangwon-si B and “C Hospital” around 17:00 on September 6, 2018, the Defendant: (b) requested the victim D (n, 45 years of age) who is an employee of the said hospital to provide medical treatment; (c) however, the victim’s period of medical treatment ends.

Along with approximately 20 minutes of disturbance, it was difficult to avoid the disturbance because of the defect that could not receive it due to the lack of it, such as: “Is the need to provide medical treatment at the Csing alcohol hospital,” which “Is the need to do so in the Csing alcohol hospital,” and the computer monitors on the Csingkke are sealed by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's hospital administration by force.

2. On September 6, 2018, the Defendant at the place indicated in the “1” clause at around 17:19, 2018, saying, “Abrecing a drunk patient at a hospital,” took contact with the 112 report, and took place at the site, expressed that the Defendant was able to put in a steel bridge, which is a dangerous object in the route of the above hospital (50cm, 45cm in width, 70cm in height and 70cm in width) with the chair of the said police officer’s body, which is a dangerous object in the street.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to CDs (Badi Camp) and investigation reports (Badi Camps)

1. Article 144(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of special duties) concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has been punished by an act of violence at least ten times.