1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 to the Plaintiff is 5% per annum from July 3, 2018 to October 10, 2019.

Basic Facts

A. The Plaintiff and C and the husband and wife who completed the marriage report on November 5, 1996, have children D (E) and F (G).

B. The defendant and C are between the elementary school and the elementary school.

C. From May 26, 2016 to May 31, 2016, the Defendant sent H messages with the following content to C, respectively:

On May 26, 2016, I would like to think that temporary text messages are bad in daily life due to a certain number of time offs.

At any time, why is why governance does not want to see why there is no answer in the text on May 27, 2016, or on May 31, 2016, because it is difficult to see the governance on May 31, 2016, or because it is difficult or difficult to do so on May 31, 2016, and it is complicated because it does not mean that it is very difficult or difficult to do so, and even if it does not do so, it would want to receive an open energy report from an open person because it is bad to a certain degree of time as much as possible.

May 31, 2016, the thickness of contact with neule

D. In addition, the Defendant sent C H message stating, “I believe that I will see that I would be a man with gale and governance,” “I will see one another’s chests, and open to each other’s chests,” “Safety Driving and Health damage”, “Finally, I would like to see that I would like to make sure that I would be a man with gale and governance, and I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see, if I would like to see, then I would like to see that I would like to see,” and “I would like to see, I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would like to see that I would like to see.

E. The Defendant and C have been traveling on March 17, 2018.

F. According to the recording files installed in C vehicles, following the day following the day on which the Defendant and C agreed on March 30, 2018, when the Defendant and C made a telephone call related to the I restaurant conference, and C referred the Defendant as “self,” the Defendant had to do so, and the Defendant had to do so to C, and the Defendant had to enter the Defendant naturally at the time of drinking breath, and there is a defect that C naturally enters the Defendant, and the Defendant should not first make a fluence with C.