The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the lower court’s sentencing (limited to 8 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence, 40 hours of probation, alcohol treatment lectures, 160 hours of community service) is too uneasy and unreasonable.

The crime of this case, however, is committed by assaulting the victim E (or, 51 years of age) who was a towing of a vessel in the church, by asking that the victim E (or 51 years of age) who was a towing of a vessel in the church is imprisoning about the face of E, etc. The victim F (or 47 years of age) who was aware of the Non-Surging of E, and was surging the head of the victim F (or 47 years of age) who was surging, and inflicted an injury on the victims, and without any justifiable reason, was committed by assaulting the victims, and thus, the crime is very bad, and E was committed by assaulting the victims, and the victims appeared to have been punished by the Defendant at the court below, and the Defendant was committed by a fine on one occasion in 208 and 2012, and is also disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, considering the fact that the degree of injury suffered by the victims due to the instant crime is not more than two to three weeks, that the Defendant deposited 1.5 million won to E in the lower court, that the Defendant deposited 1.5 million won to F in the lower court, that the lower court additionally ordered the attending lectures in alcohol treatment and community services for a considerable period of time, that the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflects, and all other circumstances that are the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed as being too unjustifiable.

Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.