1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "No person shall be subject to the last 4th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance" (the plaintiff itself as to the plaintiff's wife or as the fact that the registration certificate was lent out to the outside of his office is not a lending of the registration certificate. However, Articles 19 and 38 (1) 6 of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act prohibit not only the transfer or lending of the registration certificate, but also the "act of allowing another person to engage in brokerage business using his name or trade name" and require the cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the brokerage office in case of violation of this prohibition. D, which is not the plaintiff, knew or allowed that the brokerage business of each real estate lease contract of this case was conducted using the trade name of the brokerage office of this case, and the plaintiff seems to have been aware of, or allowed to have been engaged in brokerage business in this form, and this constitutes the grounds for the cancellation of registration under the above Acts and subordinate statutes as to the other person's name or trade name."

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.