A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a B-learning car.

On July 12, 2018, around 08:30 on July 12, 2018, the Defendant run the 148 front line of the front line of the front line of the 148 previous apartment of Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, the Seoul apartment of Seoul, with the front line of the front line of the 148 previous line of the said car, and led to the front line of the agricultural

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle on the right side of the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so while under the influence of alcohol concentration under the influence of alcohol concentration in blood and caused the Victim C's Done Star driver's negligence going beyond the central line, and shocked into the front panion and pentel part of the Defendant's vehicle driver's seat.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the said Lone Star passenger car to be repaired in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,911,248, and stopped and escaped without immediately taking necessary measures.

2. On July 12, 2018, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by a police officer F of the police box of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station, a police officer affiliated with the police station G of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station, while walking the Defendant’s walking from a police officer belonging to the police officer belonging to the Dong-gu Police Station G of the Dong-gu Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1 at around 09:18.

There is a considerable reason to determine a seal, and from that time, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting it four times in total, including 09:18, 09:23, 09:28, 09:38 on the day.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 음주 측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한...