Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for one year, respectively.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B From December 4, 2012, from around 1, 2012, a person who operated “E” on the first floor of the D 1 in Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsan-si, and Defendant A loaned his license for his own business to B on May 8, 2014 and received 1.2 million won per annum in return.

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On July 15, 2014, around 22:20 on July 15, 2014, the Defendants: (a) committed the act of similarity at the above user around the police; (b) as a result of regulating the police; (c) in order to make the investigation agency believe that the unemployed owner was the Defendant B; (d) intent was to prepare a false lease agreement stating that Defendant A leased the above first floor from the building owner F and submit it to the police station.

Defendant

B, around July 19, 2014, Defendant A displayed the actual lease agreement with F in F at the above user source, and Defendant B, in view of the form of the lease agreement that Defendant B obtained from the above user’s real estate brokerage office, indicated as “G”, “one hundred million won” in the column for the location of real estate, “three hundred million won” in the column for the rent, and “HF” in the column for the lessee, indicated as “I” in the column for the lessee, affixed his own seal on the side of the lessee’s name, and Defendant B affixed his own seal on the leased name.

As a result, the Defendants forged one chapter of the real estate lease agreement, which is a private document on the rights and obligations in the F name, for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations.

B. On July 20, 2014, Defendant A presented a false real estate lease agreement, as seen above, at the JJ division of the police station in Busan, Busan, as seen above, as if Defendant B and Defendant B were aware of the forgery, Defendant A presented that the agreement was genuinely formed to K with the police officer belonging to the above JJ division.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use the forged lease contract in the name of F.

2. Defendant B A.