The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On October 29, 2014, around 23:30 on October 29, 2014, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by finding out the victim C (here, 23 years of age) walking along the male-gu, and passing through the victim's side, while the victim's left knift knife knife knife on the part of the victim's hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and D

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 3,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes) of the Suspension of Sentence where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the crime subject to registration of personal information, which is a sexual crime subject to registration of personal information, is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the same Act, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

(However, the suspension of sentence is not invalidated after the judgment on suspension of sentence becomes final and conclusive, and the defendant is exempted from the obligation to submit personal information two years after the suspension of sentence becomes final and conclusive. In light of the defendant's age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, type, motive, process, consequence and seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the defendant's entry due to the disclosure order or notification order, the prevention effect of sexual crimes subject to registration which may be achieved thereby, and the effect of protecting the victim, it is judged that there are special circumstances that the disclosure of personal information should not be disclosed or notified pursuant to the proviso of Article 49 (1) and the proviso of Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection