1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, including the ownership of land D and E in the Republic of Korea, is the Plaintiff of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Fri”)

(2) Around April 19, 2013, the registration of ownership transfer under the Plaintiff’s name was completed with respect to five parcels of land, such as G land, H land, I land, and J land, and building on one parcel of land, other than E. (2) around April 19, 2013, the 1,091 square meters of D warehouse site was combined with 281 square meters of the D warehouse site prior to the merger and 800 square meters of the K warehouse site and 10 square meters of the L warehouse site. Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each one/2 of the 80 square meters of the D warehouse site prior to the merger and each of the 1/2 shares of the 800 square meters of the K warehouse site, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to the 1/2 shares in the name of the Defendant C on June 8, 2012 with respect to the 1/2 shares in the 800 square meters of the 800 square meters of the K warehouse site.

3) Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer under Defendant B’s name on April 7, 2016 with respect to 1,091 square meters in the D warehouse site. 4) The land and D are adjacent to each other.

B. 1) Land E and D land: (a) 1) land and D land were low, and there was a fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoral fluoral fluoring fluor around the boundary; (b) around January 2016, Nonparty O, the representative of N Co., Ltd., installed 54 meters in length and 0.5 to 5.0 meters in height on the boundary of land E and D land (hereinafter “instant fluoral fluor”).

(2) On April 21, 2016, around the instant stone axis, there was an accident involving the collapse of a part of the stone embankment, and the construction was conducted to repair the collapsed place thereafter.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that Defendant B demanded Defendant C to scam the existing tin axis and scambling a new tin, before purchasing Defendant C’s land from Defendant C, and Defendant C also demanded O to do so.