A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Fact-finding] On September 19, 2015, the Defendant entered into a human resources supply contract for the E-building Improvement Project Association, which is the business branch of the Nam-gu Seoul, Nam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, with the representative director of C, and for the ordinary general meeting of shareholders (the selection of the agenda project) of September 19, 2015.

On September 19, 2015, F Co., Ltd. entered into a contract with G Co., Ltd. for the public relations services for project owners around August 2015 in order to be selected as a contractor at the meeting of the shareholders on September 19, 2015, and F Co., Ltd. was selected as a contractor for a reconstruction improvement project at the above meeting.

On August 11, 2015, construction in F Co., Ltd., Beneficiary Construction Co., Ltd, and Land Co., Ltd., paid KRW 500 million to each of the above unions, participating in the bidding, and the contractor selected as the contractor at the above general meeting bears the general meeting cost, and the remainder of the money excluding the general meeting cost from the bid bond to the Si Co., Ltd. has decided to settle with the association when the rearrangement project is terminated by changing the name of the money lent

On September 19, 2015, H, the Vice Minister of F, Inc., changed the contract to increase the contract amount of KRW 247,191,140 to KRW 326,755,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 from G operator I, the victim of G Co., Ltd., which was demanded to increase the contract amount of KRW 326,754,355,00,000. However, H, the F Co., Ltd., the F Co., Ltd., made a verbal agreement on September 19, 2015, to pay the difference of KRW 79,563,215,

H A around October 2015, with the consent of the J, stating that “The cost to be incurred in the selection of the service companies employed by the Corporation as the contractor at the plenary session at the plenary session is defective at the general meeting cost of the instant association.”

[2] On October 1, 2015, the Defendant received from H a list of 24 labor personnel (one person K) belonging to the victim and a written statement of particulars arranged in proportion to their labor cost of KRW 79,563,00, and received from the union “79.”