The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, observation of protection, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service with six months of imprisonment) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the content, circumstances, etc. of each of the instant crimes, the crime of this case is not less complicated, and the Defendant had been punished twice as a crime of past violence, and the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even though he was punished as a fine due to an insulting crime by a police officer around 2015, despite the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes, is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake and speaks against the Defendant; (b) the extent of the type used by the Defendant during the commission of the crime interfering with the performance of official duties is relatively not more severe; (c) the Defendant did not have been punished by the obstruction of the performance of official duties; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (c) the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, it cannot

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.