logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.01.31 2016고정897
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Attached Form

Criminal facts

same as the statement (Provided, That “suspect” is replaced by “Defendant”; summary of evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning collection (certificate of seizure), reporting on details of inappropriate products, business reporting ledger (i.e., spot-sale manufacturing and processing business), and food standards and specifications;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 95 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 7 (4) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act states that the defendant who has no record of committing the crime in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act repents his mistake.

However, the crime of this case goes against the purpose of the Food Sanitation Act to contribute to the promotion of national health by preventing sanitary harm caused by food and improving the quality of food nutrition. The crime of this case goes against the purpose of the Food Sanitation Act in order to contribute to the improvement of national health. Considering the fact that the degree of the violation is very serious, including the fact that the slurg's slurg's products sold by the defendant's slurg's products are 1,670 times the standard values, the circumstances and results of this case,

arrow