beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) B, around 20:40 on May 16, 2007, driven a vehicle of C High Pest A and driven a road of E-way in D during the official city from Asan to F. A. On the other hand, the Plaintiff, who walked on the right side of the car driving direction, faced with the back side of the head of the Plaintiff, driving on the right side of the car driving direction, and caused the Plaintiff to face a gold again on the lower side of the G freight vehicle parked on the right side of the road (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) The Plaintiff suffered injury from the instant accident, etc. (i.e., brain death, etc.) and (ii) after the instant accident, the Plaintiff received tin and scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopics on October 5, 2007
3) On December 18, 2008, the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the above low-est passenger car. 4) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking compensation for damages arising from the instant accident with the court 2008Kadan448913. As to the physical entrustment (including the factual inquiry; hereinafter collectively referred to as “the physical entrustment of previous lawsuit”) of the court at the time, the appraisal was recognized as a temporary disability until the response to the treatment of the instant accident, such as the depression, under the medical treatment of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was given to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff presented a market opinion with 3 to 5 years ordinary from the date of the instant accident, and the Plaintiff claimed that the Plaintiff claimed for the lost income resulting from the subsequent disability caused by the Mali-Mali-Ma, and the subsequent medical expenses claim for additional damages during the period from July 16, 2010 to the period thereafter.
On June 23, 2011, this Court lost the Plaintiff’s ability to work for 25% as a multi-competence post-certificate for five years from the date of the instant accident.