1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution based on the decision on performance recommendation by Daejeon District Court 2013Gaso392222 against the Plaintiff is KRW 288,400.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with B, the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into the automobile insurance contract with D, the owner of the vehicle C (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. On October 25, 201, around 08:44 on October 25, 201, the Defendant’s vehicle: (a) had an accident involving the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s pentle part on the front side of the steering seat of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

On the day immediately before the occurrence of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle were in progress in the direction of the Busan Metropolitan Park March 2, 200, along with the mountain, along with the mountain, and were in progress in the future of the Grand City Art Gallery, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was in front of the mountain Park March 2, 200.

C. On November 1, 2011, the Defendant paid KRW 412,000 to the passenger E of the Plaintiff’s vehicle who suffered injury due to the instant accident.

around 2012, the defendant made the plaintiff as the defendant claim for the reimbursement of physical damage caused by the accident in this case to the committee for deliberation on the dispute over reimbursement of automobile insurance.

Accordingly, in the open sub-committee, the decision was rendered by the deliberation and resolution that “the Plaintiff: the Plaintiff’s vehicle ought to be seen as a overtaking accident of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, but the Plaintiff’s vehicle was a prior internship, and in consideration of the collision part: 65:35.” The Defendant’s liability ratio was determined by the Re-deliberation Committee, taking into account the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle was a bypass prior to the operation of the re-deliberation committee, the Defendant’s vehicle was a prior internship, the shock part, etc., and the Defendant’s liability ratio was determined to 65:35.

E. The defendant

Daejeon District Court. On the plaintiff's treatment costs in the port, Daejeon District Court.