A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 30, 2016, at around 10:40 on May 30, 2016, the Defendant found alcohol in a store located in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, and had a lot of mobile phone charges more than that of the victim D, who is an employee, and obstructed the victim’s mobile phone sales business by bringing about about 30 minutes of his/her behavior to the victim D while taking a bath.

B. The Defendant found the above day at around 13:00 again to the above C store, and for the above reason, the Defendant d expressed approximately 20 minutes of pactal to the victim D and obstructed the victim’s mobile phone sales business.

(c)

The Defendant re-exploited in the above C store around 16:50 on the same day, and for the foregoing reason, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s mobile phone sales business by putting the victim D with his desire for about 30 minutes, going beyond a monitor who was placed in the table, and trying to keep his table booms from the victim.

2. On May 30, 2016, the Defendant damaged the victim’s h cafeteria operated by the victim G in the F market located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, by taking the front of the H cafeteria operated by the victim G, on the ground that the victim cleaning the said cafeteria was h her, and the victim her h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. The criminal place;

1. On-site and damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)