1. On April 2, 2018, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of medical care for official duties rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 20, 1995, the Plaintiff entered the Korea National Railroad as a Grade-7 government bonds, and was transferred to the Korea National Railroad Agency’s application on August 3, 2001, and was promoted to an administrative officer on April 15, 201, and since September 23, 2013, Korea Post had served in the Department B of Insurance.

B. On September 23, 2017, the Plaintiff was sent to the 119 Rescue Team by seeing that the body of the left side of the body was unboomed at 09:00 p.m. and then sent back to the emergency room of Cuniversity Hospital around 10:18 a.m. on the same day.

C. The Plaintiff was diagnosed with cardio-cerebral cerebrovascular, the complete mathy, and other cerebral cerebrovascular (hereinafter “instant injury”). The Plaintiff filed an application for approval of medical care for the instant injury and disease on official duty with the Defendant.

On April 2, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to grant medical treatment to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to deem that there was a proximate causal relation between the instant branch of the instant medical service on the ground of the following reasons: “The Plaintiff’s disease appears to have occurred due to frequent business trips and excessive work, given comprehensive consideration of the Plaintiff’s duties and workloads; however, it is difficult to deem that there was a medical opinion that there was a proximate causal relation between the instant branch of the instant medical service, on the ground that there was no medical examination in 2013 and 2015; the Plaintiff was judged to have been subject to blood pressure control and abnormal blood transfusion control at the time of health examination in 2013 and 2015; drinking was confirmed due to health risk factors; according to the C-university hospital’s medical record, the Plaintiff did not take medicine despite the Plaintiff’s talking that he had high blood pressure due to excessive stress or stress; rather, it appears that the instant disease was caused by the Plaintiff’s physical and physical talent.”

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] The entry in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6, and Eul’s Evidence No. 4 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful