Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

On July 17, 2018, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving for CM5 riding, operated the said car at around 17:5 on July 17, 2018, and left to the left at the front of the window of Changwon-si at the Changwon-si, from the Jak-si, the Defendant left to the front of the road at the Changsan Village of Dong-Eup.

Since there is a long distance crossing where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to traffic signals to those engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

However, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal and caused the victim to go beyond the floor by taking the front part of the victim E(SW125) driving in accordance with the straight line on the opposite side of the running direction of the Defendant, which was driven by the victim E(SW125).

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as “affording fats on the left side and abandonment fats, etc.,” which requires approximately 16 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the Defendant, as a first offender, has been pened and reflected in his mistake, and that the Defendant agreed with the victim and the Defendant smoothly, and the means and result of the instant crime, including the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, intelligence and environment, insurance relation, etc., were determined in line with the order.