Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a director of E Co., Ltd. who is an electronic component development company, and the victim F(33) is an employee of the above company.
On December 21, 201, from around 21:00 to 23:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s telegraph at a meeting of the foregoing company located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, on the ground that his attitude of ordinary work does not appear in mind, on the ground that he assaulted the victim’s telegraph at a time, and on the ground that he was not in mind, the Defendant committed an act of assaulting the victim for approximately 28 days (hereinafter “the instant assault”).
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A written statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written diagnosis of injury (investigative records 49 pages) prepared by the doctor of the H hospital;
1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Of the facts charged in this case under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as indicated in the judgment from around 21:00 on December 21, 201 to around 23:00, the Defendant committed the instant assault and committed the instant assault to F for about 4 weeks, as in the judgment of the court below, in addition to the diversal dystrophical strophism, etc. in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment, medical doctors of H Hospital who treated F immediately after the instant assault were found to have a causal link between the medical diagnosis of this case and the dystrophism in light of the fact-finding inquiry letter to the head of H Hospital to the effect that “F suffered an injury other than the injury recognized as a result of the instant assault, if the Defendant suffered an injury on the right side of the H Hospital in addition to the injury recognized as a result of the instant assault, the medical diagnosis of this case was found after the lapse of 10th of 10th day after the date of the instant assault.