Defendant

All appeals filed by B and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentencing against the Defendants by the prosecutor is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the Defendants repeatedly committed the instant crime even though they had been recorded in several times, strict punishment against the Defendants is necessary.

However, considering the fact that the Defendants divided their mistakes, the fact that the damaged vehicle was returned, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem to be too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the above argument by the Defendant B and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. As such, the appeal by Defendant B and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.