1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be incidental to the participation.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting of the Buddhist Park Development Project for the Memorial Park (hereinafter “Hunting Hunting

) The former head of the Gu Gun (current Gwangju Gun is high in Gwangju City, and the Gwangju City Mayor takes charge of the affairs of the Gu Gun Gun .

3) The name of the area was changed to the Magpo-ri, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si

636-1 Japan (hereinafter “instant land”)

As to May 18, 199, the building of a charnel was permitted on May 18, 199 and the building of a charnel was permitted on September 6, 199 (hereinafter the foregoing charnel house and a charnel body together with the foregoing charnel house and the body of the company, etc., “the memorial park of this case”.

2) Defendant Scargs Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Scargs”) delegated the authority to implement the instant memorial park development project on behalf of Defendant Scargs on behalf of Defendant Scargs.

B. The Plaintiff, Defendant Scargs, and Defendant Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s business agreement 1) and Defendant Scargs and Defendant Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”).

(2) On September 18, 2006, the Plaintiff offered the instant land as the project implementer of the instant memorial park development project, and the Plaintiff, as a general agent of the instant memorial park development project, raised the project funds using the P/F funds from financial institutions, managed the execution thereof, and the Intervenor concluded a project agreement on the instant memorial park development project (Evidence 3-1 of the evidence No. 3) with the Plaintiff’s construction contractor of the instant memorial park development project as the contractor of the instant memorial park development project, and as a clerk, signed a contract on September 18, 2006 with the Plaintiff on January 16, 2007 (Evidence 3-1 of the evidence No. 3 of the evidence No. 3 of the said case) on an additional agreement on the business agreement on September 18, 2006.

In the case of "the total business agreements concluded on September 18, 2006 and finally changed on April 25, 2008".